<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Gadling</title>
<link>http://www.gadling.com</link>
<description>Gadling</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Greyhound customer service delivers after bus heads wrong way for more than 70 miles]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/stories/" rel="tag">Stories</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/transportation/" rel="tag">Transportation</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/budget-travel/" rel="tag">Budget Travel</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><p><a href="http://www.greyhound.com/home/"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/11/greyhoundogo.jpg" /></a>When the five people who ranged from an R&amp; B singer moving to NYC to seek her fortune-- to a young man trying to get to Hartford, Connecticut and his sick grandmother as quickly as possible, sidled up to the Greyhound ticket counter in<a href="http://www.panynj.gov/"> Port Authority bus terminal</a> in Manhattan, they weren't itching for a fight. What they wanted was some compensation for their <a href="http://www.greyhound.com/home/">Greyhound</a> induced travel woes. </p>
<p>See, the bus they had taken from Cleveland had arrived two hours late. It's not unusual for a bus to be late. Traffic, weather and a bus breakdown can occur. Their bus's lateness was due to driver error. The driver, after a scheduled rest stop, had headed the bus back towards Cleveland for more than 70 miles. </p>
<p>What made this snafu feel worse is that they would have arrived earlier than the scheduled arrival time if it wasn't for the driver's mistake. If you've ever been on a road trip that has been lengthened by the wrong way, perhaps you'll recall that jumpy nervous twitch that ensues--the kind of feeling where any moment you could LOSE YOUR MIND.</p>
<p>As written in the<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/greyhound-bus-driver-heads-wrong-way-wheres-a-gps-when-you-nee/"> previous post</a>, Gadling knows these details because Gadling was there. Here's the rest of the story. What happens when a passenger does complain? Airlines take notice.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Greyhound customer service delivers after bus heads wrong way for more than 70 miles</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/">Greyhound customer service delivers after bus heads wrong way for more than 70 miles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19231135/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/20/greyhound-customer-service-delivers-after-bus-heads-wrong-way-fo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>customer satisfaction</category><category>customer service</category><category>CustomerSatisfaction</category><category>CustomerService</category><category>Greyhound bus</category><category>GreyhoundBus</category><category>manhattan</category><category>New York City</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>passenger complaints</category><category>PassengerComplaints</category><category>port authority</category><category>PortAuthority</category><category>travel voucher</category><category>TravelVoucher</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Rhein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to effectively complain about your trip via Twitter]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/transportation/" rel="tag">Transportation</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/internet-tools/" rel="tag">Internet Tools</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/travel-deals/" rel="tag">Travel Deals</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/novecentino/2340521934/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/11/dood339le.png" alt="" /></a>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 2px;"><script type="text/javascript"> tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/'; tweetmeme_source = 'Gadling'; </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div>
Now that airlines have all jumped onto the social media bandwagon, we constantly hear about miracle stories of lone customers being helped out by a Twitter plea for help. Deep from the soul of the faceless empire, airlines and hotels have been reaching out and virtually hugging stranded travelers, breathing life into the ether and ushering the free radicals back out into their corrected itineraries. It feels great to be loved, doesn't it?<br />
<br />
What a powerful tool this Twitter is. A few well written comments to ten thousand listeners can spread vitriol quite quickly, so even if a customer's ire is misplaced it's important for companies to respond. And once they reach out, those 10,000 ears hear the praise. Southwest, for example, <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2008/07/07/hurry_up_the_customer_has_a_complaint/">reached out</a> directly when a traveler posted a comment complaining about the check-in procedure at the airport. Though they couldn't disperse the queue, their attention turned a negative situation on its side, comforting the traveler and ultimately winning credibility.<br />
<br />
Before you run off criticizing every facet of your trip to <a href="http://twitter.com/aairwaves">@AAirwaves</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/MarriottIntl">@MarriottIntl</a> though, think about your approach. While Twitter is a great tool for delivering a concise message to corporate America, if you want results you're going to need to frame yourself correctly. Here's how:<p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How to effectively complain about your trip via Twitter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/">How to effectively complain about your trip via Twitter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19242256/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/19/how-to-effectively-complain-about-your-trip-via-twitter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>media</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress to investigate airline fees ... but not for your benefit]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/activism/" rel="tag">Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/north-america/" rel="tag">North America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/united-states/" rel="tag">United States</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/business/14fees.html?ref=business"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/04/deltainterior.jpg" />Congress is digging into all those new airline fees</a>. Extra bags, special check-in situations ... you name it. Before you start cheering on our lawmakers, though, you should know that they aren't doing this from a sense of consumer advocacy. Frankly, Congress doesn't give a damn how much you pay for air travel. But, it does care how you pay. Why? A cash-strapped government is wondering if it's leaving money on the table.</p>
<p>When you look at your receipt, the line with "<a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/taxes/">taxes</a>" has never been lost on you, right? Well, the add-ons aren't included in this number: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/Congress/">Congress</a> has a tax on airfare, not all the other stuff. So, for the airlines, this has been a tax-free revenue stream, one that's been crucial to helping the already bruised airlines survive the current recession.</p>
<p>Yet, is it really just airfare in another form? That's what Congress wants to know. Even if this is a different form of revenue, do you think it will be left untouched? Of course not! The government needs money, and there's nothing stopping it from passing a new bill to tax the extra services. How much resistance would be raised?</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress to investigate airline fees ... but not for your benefit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/">Congress to investigate airline fees ... but not for your benefit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/business/14fees.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19239653/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/14/congress-to-investigate-airline-fees-but-not-for-your-benefi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>baggage</category><category>baggage fees</category><category>BaggageFees</category><category>bags</category><category>congress</category><category>extra fees</category><category>ExtraFees</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intrepid Travel saves the world with Urban Adventures charity connection]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/12/intrepid-travel-saves-the-world-with-urban-adventures-charity-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/12/intrepid-travel-saves-the-world-with-urban-adventures-charity-co/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/12/intrepid-travel-saves-the-world-with-urban-adventures-charity-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/budget-travel/" rel="tag">Budget Travel</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/11/tub-tuk-tuk_s-in-bangkok.gif" />Give and receive this <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/holidayseason/">holiday season</a>. Instead of just booking your getaway,<a href="http://www.intrepidtravel.com/" target="_blank"> Intrepid Travel</a> is upping the goodwill ante, donating 10 percent of all its new "<a href="http://www.urbanadventures.com " target="_blank">Urban Adventures</a>" sales to charity. This is a new collection of city-based experiences which is likely to appeal to a wide range -- from backpackers to business travelers. If you have a long layover or even want to see your own city from a different perspective, this new program from Intrepid could be a good fit. </p>
<p>Ten percent of every sale made in December will be donated to<a href="http://www.theintrepidfoundation.org/" target="_blank"> The Intrepid Foundation</a>, which supports 35 community projects around the world. And, Intrepid will match each of these donations fully, doubling the final amount that will be sent to the foundation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urbanadventures.com " target="_blank">Urban Adventures</a> are not expensive. They start at around $15 and go up to around $144. So, there's no reason not to check out this new experience, even if you are a local. This new experience was launched last month and is available in 26 locations around the world via 80 trips ... with another 250 expected to be added by the middle of next year. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/12/intrepid-travel-saves-the-world-with-urban-adventures-charity-co/">Intrepid Travel saves the world with Urban Adventures charity connection</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/12/intrepid-travel-saves-the-world-with-urban-adventures-charity-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19234982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/12/intrepid-travel-saves-the-world-with-urban-adventures-charity-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget travel</category><category>BudgetTravel</category><category>charity</category><category>foundation</category><category>holiday</category><category>holiday season</category><category>holidays</category><category>HolidaySeason</category><category>intrepid</category><category>intrepid travel</category><category>IntrepidTravel</category><category>philanthropy</category><category>travel discounts</category><category>TravelDiscounts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[American Airlines fires web designer over response to rant]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/north-america/" rel="tag">North America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/united-states/" rel="tag">United States</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/americanairlines.jpg" />In an era where communication is fast and easy, sometimes it's easy to forget about boundaries. <a href="http://www.aa.com" target="_blank">American Airlines</a> fired a web design employee because of this. The employee responded to a blog post from a "disgruntled user," but the airline felt he went too far, saying that he released sensitive information about American. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/item.aspx?type=blog&amp;ak=620001197.blog&amp;csp=Travel" target="_blank">This was a violation of his non-disclosure agreement with the company</a>.</p>
<p>So far, the employee is being called "Mr. X" -- an original moniker, right? Well, he saw a pretty brutal post from Dustin Curtis, an unhappy passenger. He basically <a href="http://dustincurtis.com/dear_american_airlines.html" target="_blank">wrote an open letter to the airline</a> after having "had the horrific displeasure of booking a flight on your website." It was so bad, he wrote, "that I vowed never to fly your airline again." He then offered some suggestions, drawing on his background as a user interface designer and closed with the sentiment: "Imagine what you could do with a full, totally competent design team."</p>
<p>According to Curtis, it only took American an hour to fire "Mr. X" after he addressed to the employee's response. Yep, a decade of experience as a user interface designer and a portfolio that Curtis wrote, has "some great work," went down the tubes. <a href="http://dustincurtis.com/dear_dustin_curtis.html" target="_blank">In an e-mail to Curtis</a>, Mr. X explains the internal situation at American's <a href="http://www.aa.com" target="_blank">AA.com</a> group in considerable detail. He provides insights into which groups handle specific functions and is kind enough to point out that there are some enhancements coming in the next 12 to 18 months (so, keep an eye out for them). </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>American Airlines fires web designer over response to rant</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/">American Airlines fires web designer over response to rant</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/item.aspx?type=blog&amp;ak=620001197.blog&amp;csp=Travel>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19232079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/11/american-airlines-fires-web-designer-over-response-to-rant/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>internet</category><category>scandal</category><category>user interface</category><category>UserInterface</category><category>website</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Travel professionals: stop going the extra mile]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/hotels/" rel="tag">Hotels and Accommodations</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airports/" rel="tag">Airports</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><p style="DISPLAY: block" align="left"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/newdamage/4015483710/" target="_blank"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/11/longline.jpg" /></a>It sounds counterintuitive, right? Normally, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/customers/">customers</a> expect that extra effort, and we complain constantly that we don't get it enough. What we sometimes don't understand, though, is that the extra effort is at the root of many of the customer service problems we encounter. Going the extra mile at the wrong time can be a disaster.</p>
<p>I remember a case presented at a conference I attended back in 1999 (yeah, it made an impression), when I was a consultant in the <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/hotelindustry/">hotel industry</a>. Some customer service guru was teaching us how to better serve our clients - which was pretty important, since our clients, the <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/hotels/">hotels</a>, were in the service business. She discussed with us a bank teller who spent extra time with a customer - going that extra mile" - even though there was a long line waiting. The guru couldn't summon enough praise for this teller. Even though <em>everybody else was waiting</em>, this teller put forth more than was necessary to make a customer happy.</p>
<p>Almost as soon as the story was over, people in different parts of the audience barked almost in unison, "What about everyone else?" The service aficionado spent several minutes ducking and dodging as a growing number of attendees hurled the lines of "I'd be pissed," "That's not good <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/service/">service</a>!" and "Do you really believe that stuff?" She eventually recovered and finished her session, but the discussion at the bar that night was all about whether to please the one at the expense of the many.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Travel professionals: stop going the extra mile</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/">Travel professionals: stop going the extra mile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19225208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/06/travel-professionals-stop-going-the-extra-mile/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airport</category><category>customer satisfaction</category><category>customer service</category><category>customers</category><category>CustomerSatisfaction</category><category>CustomerService</category><category>hotel industry</category><category>HotelIndustry</category><category>passenger</category><category>passengers</category><category>retail</category><category>retailers</category><category>service</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are the economics of Twitter airfares worth it?]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/budget-travel/" rel="tag">Budget Travel</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/andresrueda/2277058161/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/jdoodl.jpg" /></a>More and more budget-travel tipsters are pointing towards Twitter, Facebook and social media outlets as the source for wild cheap airfares these days. And it's true, in a way. By subscribing to the pundit feeds online it's possible to get the inside scoop on a few good routes, often saving a few shekels on a future itinerary. <br /><br />Broad, dirt cheap fares (sometimes called bingos), however, are harder to pin down. You've probably heard about the one guy who got a $7 airfare to Iceland or the other woman who flew to Buenos Aires for $40. These (mistake) fares usually occur two or three times a year and more often than not, last less than 24 hours. Yet these are the tickets that fuel the pundit followers. <br /><br />Now, with the proliferation of active Twitterers, Flyertalk and Slickdeals, bingo fares are becoming harder and harder to find. Rick Seaney (<a href="http://twitter.com/rickseaney">@rickseaney</a>) is a great example. The CEO of <a href="http://farecompare.com">Farecompare</a> has access to a broad spectrum of ticket data before it gets sent to travel agents like Orbitz and Expedia and as such, has a virtual crystal-ball into airfares that are going to soon be available. Great position to Tweet from, right? But can't the airlines follow the same feed? Could they perhaps pay Mr. Seaney to find mistakes before we do? It's not unlikely.<p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are the economics of Twitter airfares worth it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/">Are the economics of Twitter airfares worth it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19208375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/04/are-the-economics-of-twitter-airfares-worth-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airfare</category><category>airplane</category><category>budget-travel</category><category>cheap tickets</category><category>CheapTickets</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Have you ever passed up the cheapest airfare to avoid a bad airline?]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airports/" rel="tag">Airports</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airline-reviews/" rel="tag">Airline Reviews</a></p><p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="161" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/airport-line-2834.jpg" />People love to complain about the dismal state of air travel these days. Whether it's the stomach-churning airline food (and there's so little of it!), the complete lack of leg room, or the fact that your luggage was for some reason routed through Honolulu, we've come to expect some pretty poor service from quite a few airlines these days.</p>
<p>In any other industry, customers register their indignation by refusing to spend money at the offending establishment. Found a finger in your Caesar's Salad? You're probably never visiting that restaurant again. Tired of your cable cutting out in the middle of <em>House</em>? You just might cancel that company's service and call up their competitor (who'll probably even throw in a year of <a href="http://www.starz.com">Starz</a> at no extra charge!)</p>
<p>But with airlines, we're like the pathetic girlfriend who's been cheated on five times but still believes her boyfriend when he says, "Seriously, this time will be different! I've changed!" The worst airlines stay in business because by and large people are willing to put up with crummy service if it means they get a cheap flight.</p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Poll: Have you ever passed up the cheapest airfare to avoid a bad airline?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/">Poll: Have you ever passed up the cheapest airfare to avoid a bad airline?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19214340/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/11/03/have-you-ever-passed-up-the-cheapest-airfare-to-avoid-a-bad-airl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air travel</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirTravel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Hotfelder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Free press travel: necessary ... and certainly not an evil]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/activism/" rel="tag">Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/north-america/" rel="tag">North America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/united-states/" rel="tag">United States</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/internet-tools/" rel="tag">Internet Tools</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><p align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/ritzcarltonnaples.jpg" /></p>
<p> </p>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 2px;"><script type="text/javascript"> tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/'; tweetmeme_source = 'Gadling'; </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div>
The <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/blogosphere/">blogosphere</a> has been heating up over the issue of ethics and "<a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/swag/">swag</a>." There's plenty of free stuff flowing through the media industry. At <a href="http://www.gadling.com" target="_blank">Gadling</a>, obviously, the big one is <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/travel/">travel</a>, but <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/gadgets/">gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/books/">books</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/liquor/">liquor</a>, <a href="http://www.luxist.com/tag/cigars" target="_blank">cigars</a> and other products are often supplied for use in writing a story. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703746604574461220828153720.html" target="_blank">The Federal Trade Commission has made what was a debate into a legal issue</a> by requiring disclosure by <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/bloggers/">bloggers</a> when they receive these freebies (Gadling already requires this, so no changes will be necessary here). The issue is not only contentious, but it's emerging unevenly. In the end, it's the readers who will be impacted.
<p> </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/FTC/">FTC</a> rule requires disclosure only by bloggers - traditional media outlets will not be affected, despite the fact that they receive plenty of swag ... and that we (the bloggers) learned it from them. If the goal is to help the consumer make an informed decision, this rule will only "help" blog readers and leave consumers of traditional media exposed.</p>
<p>Beyond the question of fairness, though, there's a greater issue: practicality. Especially in the travel space, the trips and gear provided by <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/hotels/">hotels</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/restaurants/">restaurants</a>, manufacturers and their <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/publicists/">publicists</a> is a vital part of how we can provide more than mere reblogs of "man pukes on a plane." Original travel content comes at a cost. <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/Travelwriters/">Travel writers</a> need to be out on the road to be effective, and even 12 months of discount travel can add up quickly. For readers interested in luxury and upscale experiences (and there are many here and at Luxist, where I also write), it would be impossible for impoverished bloggers to deliver first-hand accounts of these destinations.</p>
<p>It can be tough to understand the role that comp'ed travel can play in an operation such as Gadlings - or that of any other publication that covers travel. So, to help clarify the issues involved, here are 10 factors that help make sponsored press trips effective.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Free press travel: necessary ... and certainly not an evil</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/">Free press travel: necessary ... and certainly not an evil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19206984/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/23/free-press-travel-necessary-and-certainly-not-an-evil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blog</category><category>blogging</category><category>blogosphere</category><category>blogs</category><category>federal trade commission</category><category>FederalTradeCommission</category><category>ftc</category><category>press release</category><category>press releases</category><category>press trip</category><category>PressRelease</category><category>PressReleases</category><category>PressTrip</category><category>public relations</category><category>publicist</category><category>publicists</category><category>PublicRelations</category><category>swag</category><category>travel</category><category>travel industry</category><category>travel writers</category><category>travel writing</category><category>TravelIndustry</category><category>TravelWriters</category><category>TravelWriting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Responsible Travel changes their mind]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/16/responsible-travel-changes-their-mind/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/16/responsible-travel-changes-their-mind/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/16/responsible-travel-changes-their-mind/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/ecotourism/" rel="tag">Ecotourism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oliveralex/1442644013/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/1442644013_45eb424ba3.jpg"  alt="For the children, folks." /></a><a href="http://responsibletravel.com">ResponsibleTravel.com</a>, a website known for providing eco-friendly vacation options, has changed their mind about something important. Especially after all our climate change talk yesterday (<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/can-travel-really-be-eco-friendly-a-closer-look/">Blog Action Day</a>), with the topic fresh in our minds, let's talk about carbon offsets.<br /><br />A recent report by <a href="http://www.foe.org/">Friends of the Earth</a> states:<br />"Carbon offsets distract tourists from the need to reduce their emissions. They create a 'medieval pardon' for us to carry on behaving in the same way (or worse)."<br /><br />Interesting point. So interesting, that Responsible Travel has removed the carbon offset widget from their site. The company has offered travelers the option of calculating their trip's carbon footprint since 2002, so as to enable them to offset the environmental cost -- but no more.<br /><br />According to Responsible Travel's Justin Francis:<br />"We believe that the travel industry's priority must be to reduce carbon emissions, rather than to offset. Too often offsets are being used by the tourism industry in developed countries to justify growth plans on the basis that money will be donated to projects in developing countries. Global reduction targets will not be met this way."<br /><br />So, there's some food for thought. We certainly don't want to make anyone feel guilty for traveling, and if you're <em>going</em> to travel, carbon offsets aren't a bad thing, but keep in mind that you can make smart choices that will reduce your emissions. Responsible Travel can help.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/16/responsible-travel-changes-their-mind/">Responsible Travel changes their mind</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/16/responsible-travel-changes-their-mind/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19199131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/16/responsible-travel-changes-their-mind/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carbon offsets</category><category>CarbonOffsets</category><category>climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>eco-friendly</category><category>friends-of-the-earth</category><category>responsible-travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Annie Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bio jet-fuel: fact or fiction?]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bio-jet-fuel-fact-or-fiction/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bio-jet-fuel-fact-or-fiction/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bio-jet-fuel-fact-or-fiction/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/ecotourism/" rel="tag">Ecotourism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/smaedli/3377497888/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/doodle3029.jpg" /></a>The new trend among all sorts of green energies is in bio-fuels, those combustible fluids made from renewable sources such as switch grass, corn or soybeans. They're all over the place in the automotive industry, millions of cars burning E38, offering flex fuel options and touting their eco consciousness.<br /><br />It should only follow that the airline industry jumped on the wagon.<br /><br />But how valid is the concept of using bio-fuels to power an aircraft? From the combustion standpoint, the science is there, and several airlines have already proved that bio-fuels can be used for propulsion. Virgin Atlantic, Air New Zealand and JAL have <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2008/11/13/boeing-and-air-new-zealand-to-test-2nd-generation-biofuel/">all operated</a> international flights with partially loaded eco-fuels, while stateside, Continental <a href="http://industry.bnet.com/travel/10002477/continentals-biofuel-test-results-are-good/">has also shown positive</a> results in one of their Boeing 737 aircraft.<br /><br />Could this all just be part of the marketing eco trend though? ANZ's 747 on which they performed their bio fuel test was <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/6/8/72715/71125/travel/Air+New+Zealand+Sends+Its+Biofuel+Jumbo+Jet+to+the+Wreckers">scrapped last year</a> after sitting on the idle tarmac, and ever since the main media hump earlier this year, jet bio fuel tests have been pretty mum. The fact of the matter is, irrespective of the source or processing, eco fuel just isn't as efficient as anything from fossil sources. And when it comes to the bottom line, we all know that the airlines love to be frugal.<br /><br />Asked about the current market's readiness towards bio fuel, out source inside of the production industry was cautious, saying " ... there are some unsubstantiated claims out there and things like stunts with test flights do not have anything to do with the readiness of the fuel on a production basis for air travel."<br /><br />Take that for what it's worth, but it sounds like eco-fuels have a long way to go before entering the mainstream air travel industry.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bio-jet-fuel-fact-or-fiction/">Bio jet-fuel: fact or fiction?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bio-jet-fuel-fact-or-fiction/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19197419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bio-jet-fuel-fact-or-fiction/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aircraft</category><category>airplane</category><category>bio-fuel</category><category>ethanol</category><category>fuel</category><category>gas</category><category>jet fuel</category><category>jetfuel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bury the turtle.]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bury-the-turtle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bury-the-turtle/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bury-the-turtle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/north-america/" rel="tag">North America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="A Fairmont Kea Lani Turtle Tag"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/cimg8623.jpg" />At the <a href="http://www.luxist.com/2009/10/04/the-fairmont-kea-lani/">Fairmont Kea Lani</a>, the gift shop is stocked with some very eco-friendly fare. To make it easy for guests to see which items are greenest, they tag the items with turtle tags like this one. <br /><br />Yeah, yeah, a special tag. Whatever. Right? Actually, it's more special than you might think. The turtles are made from biodegradable fiber and actually embedded with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forget-me-not">forget-me-not</a> seeds. You can<em> plant</em> this turtle inside or outside, the paper will biodegrade, and you'll have your very own pretty, blue, Fairmont forget-me-not flowers. That's not only a very creative way to encourage eco-conscious shopping, it's a great way to have a reminder of your vacation -- or, you know, forget-it-not. (Sorry.)<br /><br />The Fairmont Kea Lani has a number of environmental initiatives you can read about <a href="http://www.fairmont.com/EN_FA/Property/KEA/Vanity/EnvironmentalInitiatives.htm">here</a>, including motion sensors that control the air conditioning and the Recycling Cents program which allows charities to cash in their bottles and cans. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a turtle to bury.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bury-the-turtle/">Bury the turtle.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bury-the-turtle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19196027/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/15/bury-the-turtle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fairmont</category><category>green</category><category>hawaii</category><category>kea lani</category><category>maui</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Annie Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Monuments Fund announces list of endangered treasures]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/activism/" rel="tag">Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/cultures/" rel="tag">Arts and Culture</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/history/" rel="tag">History</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/africa/" rel="tag">Africa</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/asia/" rel="tag">Asia</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/europe/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/north-america/" rel="tag">North America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/oceania/" rel="tag">Oceania</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/south-america/" rel="tag">South America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/bhutan/" rel="tag">Bhutan</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/spain/" rel="tag">Spain</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/united-states/" rel="tag">United States</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/ecotourism/" rel="tag">Ecotourism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/central-america/" rel="tag">Central America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/caribbean/" rel="tag">Caribbean</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/avila_dichohecho.jpg" alt="" />
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 2px;"><script type="text/javascript"> tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/'; tweetmeme_source = 'Gadling'; </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div>
The <a href="http://www.wmf.org/">World Monuments Fund</a>, a private organization battling to preserve the world's great man-made wonders, has published a list of the most endangered monuments around the world.<br />
<br />
It's a depressing litany of priceless places that are under threat from a variety of factors, mostly related to human greed.<br />
<br />
Some monuments are fantastic, such as the mountaintop <a href="http://www.wmf.org/project/phajoding">monasteries of Phajoding</a> in Bhutan, where centuries of peace and solitude are being disturbed by an increasing number of trekkers seeking peace and solitude.<br />
<br />
Others are more mundane places that you might not even notice, yet they're important artifacts of history, like the farm fields of <a href="http://www.wmf.org/project/cultural-landscape-hadley-massachusetts">Hadley, Massachusetts</a>. When the Puritans first settled here in 1659 they replicated the system of open, narrow fields that they knew from England. The field system still exists today, but this legacy of America's early settlers has now been rezoned for commercial and residential buildings, including a Wal-Mart Supercenter.<br />
<br />
My own adopted country of Spain has seven entries to the list. The <a href="http://www.wmf.org/project/old-town-%C3%A1vila-ciudad-vieja-de-%C3%A1vila">old medieval town of Avila</a> (pictured here) is facing increasing pressure from new building, while <a href="http://www.wmf.org/project/temple-expiatori-de-la-sagrada-fam%C3%ADlia">Gaud&iacute;'s famous cathedral </a>in Barcelona is threatened by the construction of a high-speed railroad right next to it. That a rich, moderately-sized country should have so many entries should come as no surprise to Spanish residents. "Developers" have been ruining the Spanish landscape for years, fueling a building boom that crashed last year and flung the country into a deep recession. The most glaring example of the rapacity of the Spanish real estate market is the coastline, where a ring of apartments, homes, and hotels encircle the country like a garrote. Some of this construction is illegal, but campaigners have had only limited success in stopping it.<br />
<br />
The list has been published every two years since 1996 in order to bring attention to cultural heritage sites that are threatened by natural or man-made factors, although the bulk of them are man-made. Many of the sites that make it onto the list get sizable donations from the World Monuments Fund to help their caretakers preserve them.<br />
<br />
Best of luck guys, given constantly expanding urban areas and a rising population, you'll need it.<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/world-monuments-fund-2010-endangered-list/">World Monuments Fund 2010 Endangered List</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/world-monuments-fund-2010-endangered-list/2363992/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/sagrada_familia_jullag_wiki_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Família" title="Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Família" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/world-monuments-fund-2010-endangered-list/2363991/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/herat_sven_dirks_wiki_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Historic town of Herat" title="Historic town of Herat" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/world-monuments-fund-2010-endangered-list/2363990/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/-feheregyhaza_vargatamas_wiki_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Fortified Church at Viscri" title="Fortified Church at Viscri" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/world-monuments-fund-2010-endangered-list/2363989/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/concepcion_church_bamse_wiki_thumbnail.jpg" alt="The Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos" title="The Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/world-monuments-fund-2010-endangered-list/2363988/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/10/sarkipoor_paki_asimzb_wiki_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Old building in Shikarpoor, Pakistan" title="Old building in Shikarpoor, Pakistan" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/">World Monuments Fund announces list of endangered treasures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19188295/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/10/14/world-monuments-fund-announces-list-of-endangered-treasures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>archaeology</category><category>archeology</category><category>Avila</category><category>Barcelona</category><category>buddhism</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>monasteries</category><category>monastery</category><category>monuments</category><category>preservation</category><category>world heritage</category><category>world heritage list</category><category>world heritage site</category><category>world heritage sites</category><category>WorldHeritage</category><category>WorldHeritageList</category><category>WorldHeritageSite</category><category>WorldHeritageSites</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean McLachlan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should a medical exam be required before a major trek?]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/climbing/" rel="tag">Climbing</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/hiking/" rel="tag">Hiking</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/africa/" rel="tag">Africa</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/oceania/" rel="tag">Oceania</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/tanzania/" rel="tag">Tanzania</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/australia/" rel="tag">Australia</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/papua-new-guinea/" rel="tag">Papua New Guinea</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/camping/" rel="tag">Camping</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OwenStanleyRangeOwersCornerView.jpg"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/09/owenstanleyrangeowerscornerview.jpg" /></a>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 2px;"><script type="text/javascript"> tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/'; tweetmeme_source = 'Gadling'; </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div>
Physicians and politicians in Australia are <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/calls-for-mandatory-health-checks-for-kokoda-trekkers-20090929-g9sj.html">calling for mandatory physicals</a> for any trekkers preparing to hike the Kokoda Track according to Aussie newspaper <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/"><em>The Age</em></a>. The Kokoda is a difficult and remote trail in Papua New Guinea, which has claimed the lives of three hikers this year alone. The track runs 60 miles in length through a region where the Australian military fought a pitched battle with the Japanese during WWII, and it has become a popular tourist attraction in recent years.<br />
<br />
The latest person to die on the Kokoda was a 38 year old man named Paul Bradfield who was hiking the trail as part of a fund raising effort for a children's charity. Before the hike he was believed to have been in good health and spent weeks training for trip. The exact cause of his death is still unknown, but it is believed that he suffered a heart attack while hiking. The other two people to die on the trail this year were also quite young as well. One was a 26 year old man, and the other a 36 year old woman. <br />
<br />
This story brings up an interesting debate. Should a physical be required before embarking on any major trek? At what point does a government begin enforcing such requirements and how exactly do they do so? At the moment, Australia has no requirements of the trekking companies that operate on the Kokoda, but they are developing a "code of conduct" for those hiking the trail, and are now strongly considering the requirement of a medical check as well. <br /><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should a medical exam be required before a major trek?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/">Should a medical exam be required before a major trek?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/calls-for-mandatory-health-checks-for-kokoda-trekkers-20090929-g9sj.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19178851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/30/should-physicals-be-requiried-before-long-treks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adventure travel</category><category>adventure-travel</category><category>AdventureTravel</category><category>climbing</category><category>health</category><category>hiking</category><category>kilimanjaro</category><category>kokoda track</category><category>KokodaTrack</category><category>medical checkup</category><category>medical checkups</category><category>MedicalCheckup</category><category>MedicalCheckups</category><category>mt. kilimanjaro</category><category>Mt.Kilimanjaro</category><category>trekkers</category><category>trekking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kraig Becker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[San Francisco airport wants to sell you carbon offset credits]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/ecotourism/" rel="tag">Ecotourism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airports/" rel="tag">Airports</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><img width="252" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="190" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/09/sanfran-[gadling].jpg" />As of yesterday, passengers departing from San Francisco international airport can purchase carbon offset credits before taking their flight. The credits are called "Climate Passport", and they can be bought from electronic kiosks located throughout the airport. <br /><br />Each ton of carbon offsets costs $13.50, and a typical transcontinental flight spits out about 1.9 tons. Offsetting that will cost you just under $25. Of course, that number is for the total amount per flight, so if more than one passenger on a flight pays for the offsets, the flight will theoretically be carbon negative.<br /><br />The money gets split - $12.00 goes towards the Garcia River Forest project, and $1.50 goes to the city of San Francisco to support local carbon reduction projects. <br /><br />The kiosks cost $190,000 to install, and to me that seems like a heck of a lot of money for something that is going to be a pretty hard sell. On paper the project looks great - it allows passengers to help the environment without having to give up much more than a little of their cash, but in reality I really don't see many passengers participating - though I'd like to be proven wrong.<br /><br />You can learn more about the program, and how the collected money is spent, <a href="http://sfo.3degreesinc.com/">at the Climate Passport web site</a>.<br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/#poll34551">View Poll</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/">San Francisco airport wants to sell you carbon offset credits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19166122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/18/san-francisco-airport-wants-to-sell-you-carbon-offset-credits/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carbon</category><category>carbon dioxide</category><category>carbon emissions</category><category>carbon footprint</category><category>carbon neutral</category><category>carbon offsets</category><category>CarbonDioxide</category><category>CarbonEmissions</category><category>CarbonFootprint</category><category>CarbonNeutral</category><category>CarbonOffsets</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Carmichael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The best from the weird and wacky world of tourist complaints]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/stories/" rel="tag">Stories</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/hotels/" rel="tag">Hotels and Accommodations</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airlines/" rel="tag">Airlines</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/60588258@N00/3293465641/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/09/gavel-[gadling-bumper].png" /></a><br />
<br />
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 2px;"><script type="text/javascript"> tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/'; tweetmeme_source = 'Gadling'; </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://tweetmeme.com/i/scripts/button.js"></script></div>
We tourists are a curious bunch - apparently, by paying for our trip, some of us feel we are entitled to absolute perfection. In this lineup, we've listed several of the most insane lawsuits taken to court by tourists. <br />
<br />
Have you ever encountered something so ridiculous on a trip, that you had to take your case to court?<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/#poll34500">View Poll</a></p><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The best from the weird and wacky world of tourist complaints</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/">The best from the weird and wacky world of tourist complaints</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19164812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/17/the-best-from-the-weird-and-wacky-world-of-tourist-complaints/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beach</category><category>hotel</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>lawsuit settlement</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>LawsuitSettlement</category><category>pool</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Carmichael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Airports say no to sexy Pamela Anderson PETA commercial]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airports/" rel="tag">Airports</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><embed height="441" width="580" src="http://www.petatv.com/swf/video.swf?v=pam_cdf_peta_high,stolen_for_fashion_std_high,whose_skin_are_you_in-peta-peta2_high_high" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed><br />
<a href="http://www.peta.org/crueltydoesntfly/default.asp?c=pcdfec09">'Cruelty Doesn't Fly'-Learn More at PETA.org.</a> <br />
<br />
PETA - the organization that fights for animal rights, is in the news again. This time, it is because one of their commercials has been banned from airport TV's. <br />
<br />
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/travel_places/Airports_Ban_Sexy_Pamela_Anderson_PETA_Commercial_NSFW_VID'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span> The animal rights fighters created a TV spot featuring Pamela Anderson, with the purpose of trying to convince people not to wear animal products. Their message is that "Cruelty doesn't fly", and that wearing skins, fur, leather or wool is not OK. <br />
<br />
I can understand their objections to fur or exotic skins, but wool? Seriously? As is usually the case with PETA, they <a href="http://www.peta.org/crueltydoesntfly/whattoknow.asp">paint a pretty gruesome picture</a> of how animals are treated.<br />
<br />
According to PETA, they had planned to run the ad on CNN airport edition, but were told that it was "too racy" - watch the video above, and let us know in the comments whether you think it is appropriate to be played on airport TV's.<p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Airports say no to sexy Pamela Anderson PETA commercial</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/">Airports say no to sexy Pamela Anderson PETA commercial</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19156847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/10/airports-say-no-to-sexy-pamela-anderson-peta-commercial/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>pamela anderson</category><category>PamelaAnderson</category><category>peta</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Carmichael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Voluntourism in Costa Rica doesn't have to be expensive]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/02/voluntourism-in-costa-rica-doesn-t-have-to-be-expesnive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/02/voluntourism-in-costa-rica-doesn-t-have-to-be-expesnive/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/02/voluntourism-in-costa-rica-doesn-t-have-to-be-expesnive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/activism/" rel="tag">Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/cultures/" rel="tag">Arts and Culture</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/costa-rica/" rel="tag">Costa Rica</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/central-america/" rel="tag">Central America</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.tropicaladventures.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/3633719902_8f67dd2c22_b.jpg" alt="" />Tropical Adventures</a> is making it pretty easy for travelers to save the world. The company's new Cultural Encounter Package offers a six-night/seven-day package at a steep discount of 45 percent. The first two nights are at the historic Hotel Don Carlos, with the other four in the Bamboo Cultural Center's rustic accommodations in the Talmanaca Indigenous Region. The package includes all meals and some snacks, as well as upgraded transfers to all locations.</p>
<p>Once in <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/CostaRica/">Costa Rica</a>, you can take advantage of <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/volunteering/">volunteering</a> opportunities at an elementary school, retirement home and indigenous cultural center. Also, a five-hour local farm tour is available, where you'll get the chance to see exotic and unusual frogs, birds and butterflies, among other animals. </p>
<p>Based on double-occupancy, the trip costs $899, and the package is good through the last day of February next year. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/02/voluntourism-in-costa-rica-doesn-t-have-to-be-expesnive/">Voluntourism in Costa Rica doesn't have to be expensive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/02/voluntourism-in-costa-rica-doesn-t-have-to-be-expesnive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19144678/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/02/voluntourism-in-costa-rica-doesn-t-have-to-be-expesnive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>costa rica</category><category>CostaRica</category><category>volunteer</category><category>volunteer vacation</category><category>volunteering</category><category>volunteers</category><category>VolunteerVacation</category><category>voluntourism</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bowermaster's Adventures -- Kamchatka v. Kodiak, What a Difference 225 Years Makes]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/activism/" rel="tag">Activism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/cultures/" rel="tag">Arts and Culture</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/hiking/" rel="tag">Hiking</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/history/" rel="tag">History</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/learning/" rel="tag">Learning</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/asia/" rel="tag">Asia</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/north-america/" rel="tag">North America</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/russian-federation/" rel="tag">Russian Federation</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/united-states/" rel="tag">United States</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/ecotourism/" rel="tag">Ecotourism</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/bcrane000.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br /> We sailed into Kodiak on a somewhat rarified day for this part of the world, one filled with sunshine rather than rain. The weekend just past had been its annual Crab Fest, an event dampened by typical summer weather: horizontal rain and temperatures just above freezing. But on a big, blue, sun-shiny day you'd be hard-pressed to imagine a more beautiful place, the entirety of Kodiak Island and the snowcapped mountains that rim it wrapped beneath an indigo blue sky. <br /><br />Ironically, the place it reminded me of most of was Kamchatka, where we'd been a week before. Both are spectacular lands of active volcanoes and hot, spurting geysers. The seas that surround both are the same steel-blue, the volcanic mountain ranges similarly tall and foreboding, with fishing boats moving in and out of the bays. Both regions share physical turmoil as well as beauty, visited frequently by earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunami waves. Rain is a constant for both (Kamchatka, 110 inches a year, Kodiak, 68).  <br /><br />Though separated by one thousand miles of Bering Sea they started out with similar human roots as well. The very first Russian colony in North America was founded in 1784 at Three Saints Bay on southeastern Kodiak Island and until 1804 it was the center of Russian activity in Alaska. Russians are responsible for the name "Alaska," derived from the Aleut alaxsxaq, meaning "the mainland" or more literally, "the object towards which the action of the sea is directed." <br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/kamchatka/">Kamchatka</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/kamchatka/2194320/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/bkam008_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/kamchatka/2194319/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/bkam007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/kamchatka/2194318/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/bkam006_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/kamchatka/2194317/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/bkam005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.gadling.com/photos/kamchatka/2194316/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/bkam004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bowermaster's Adventures -- Kamchatka v. Kodiak, What a Difference 225 Years Makes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/">Bowermaster's Adventures -- Kamchatka v. Kodiak, What a Difference 225 Years Makes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19123394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/bowermasters-adventures-kamchatka-v-kodiak-what-a-differen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adventure-travel</category><category>alaska</category><category>bowermastersadventures</category><category>jba</category><category>jon bowermaster</category><category>JonBowermaster</category><category>kamchatka</category><category>kodiak</category><category>russia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Bowermaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More power for the government to search your laptop at the border]]></title><link>http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/</guid><comments>http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/airports/" rel="tag">Airports</a>, <a href="http://www.gadling.com/category/consumer-activism/" rel="tag">Consumer Activism</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/22939124@N08/2370929884/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.gadling.com/media/2009/08/2370929884_836429291d-[gadling].jpg" alt="" /></a>For years, border protection agents have been permitted to inspect and/or seize your laptop, smartphone or other data storage device. <br /><br />Under new legislation introduced today, those rules grant even more power, while trying to give the appearance of increased privacy for the owner of the data.<br /><br />Previously, it didn't really matter what you had on your computer - anything was allowed to be inspected. This obviously meant that legal documents, medical records and even classified business documents could be inspected, without you being allowed to do anything about it. <br /><br />With these new rules, border agents can search all the "business documents" they want, but need to contact their own counsel when they encounter legal or other sensitive files.<br /><br />One other new addition to the rules is that agents are now allowed to inspect the contents of your computer when you arrive <strong>and</strong> when you leave the country. <br /><br />What this means to the common traveler? Well, unless you are carrying child porn or anything else illegal, you have nothing to worry about.<p><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More power for the government to search your laptop at the border</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/">More power for the government to search your laptop at the border</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.gadling.com">Gadling</a> on Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/forward/19143219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/08/27/more-power-for-the-government-to-search-your-laptop-at-the-bord/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>borders</category><category>homeland security</category><category>homeland security committee</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>HomelandSecurityCommittee</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Carmichael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>